Swit Обзор цен

"It was very satisfying to be able to manage organizational tasks based on OKRs. The entire collaboration process is easy to track in terms of how well it aligns with the organization's goals, and the dashboard provided to view all notifications and data generated during the collaboration process is also very powerful. Swit provides various layouts for project management, including the Kanban board for managing progress, the list view for easily checking the contents of tasks, and the Gantt view for reviewing the overall progress of the project, which was also attractive.

_Check your messagDifficult to retrace after checking messages _I'm participating, but I'm getting unnecessary notifications about unrelated work

I was able to manage and organize various tasks. I was able to assign responsibilities by designating a person in charge of work and check the progress of the work. In addition, the biggest advantage of helping work progress was the ability to communicate in real time.

It is convenient to share related data using external plugins (especially related to Google).

In the Linux environment, there is no application and cannot be used except for Google Chrome (etc. Firefox).

It is easy to check by status, task, or person in charge in an ongoing project. The amount of time required to search for information related to a specific task is reduced.

Swit improves task management efficiency by enabling buckets and timelines to be used for tasks in progress.

In Swit, it is necessary to designate each participant in the task, which causes inconvenience in performing tasks of a specific size or more.

It is possible to efficiently manage work and human resources in a situation where there are several projects and manpower in charge is mixed. Based on efficient work management, time that can be devoted to other tasks has increased.

1. Basic business chat function 2. Possible to share work with the person in charge for each project. 3. Easy to manage projects. 4. It is possible to find out how far other people in charge have done their work.

1. Lots of updates. Whether the function has been added or a simple version update Indie needs an explanation. 2. There is difficulty in learning the function in the beginning. 3. There are many times when you don't know after looking at the user manual, such as a function inquiry. I wish there was a function such as a real-time chat with a counselor. Even if I ask by e-mail, there is often no reply.

project management

Can categorize as much as detailed, also can see the detailed process of the project and all action plans at a glance.

There is nothing I dislike about Swit.

Don't have to find who is in charge of the subject, and don't have to ask to share the materials for the project in person. Everything can be uploaded at Swit.

It makes the team see where we are and who is in charge of etc. Visibilities and synchros are the best one when I use this tool. Also the Swit team is very supportive to develop and improve its tool upon the requests.

No special one was found during my usage.

Understanding the progress of collaboration with various team members and sharing real-time data, etc.

What I like the most is that it is convenient and intuitive to communicate work-related by linking projects and channels. Since channels are divided for each project, misunderstandings rarely occur in the communication process. It is also easy to search for work-related records in the future.

It is difficult to manage schedule and man-power, if there are several projects I should manage. I cannot see the status of multiple projects at a page.

It is now possible to designate a clear person in charge and give work orders. The progress of each person in charge can be checked in real time, and related communication can be easily performed. The history of each task is very helpful in finding the cause of the problem and a solution when a problem occurs in the future.

Not only project management, but also in-house communicator tools were installed. No need to separately use and manage communication tools and project management tools

It is a bit expensive to use. In conclusion, the price is the same as Asana's first paid tier, but not only Asana, but also communication tools (slack, Monday) It can be considered relatively inexpensive because it is equipped with features of.

It is easy to check the business due to the business caIt seems you know what users value most. I think it's like not having a lot of information. The most necessary functions are highlighted, and the rest of the functions have a UI that can be used if necessary.rd.